The Kennedy Center recently removed the name of the current president, a violation of federal law, reinstating its identity as a memorial to John F. Kennedy. This incident reflects a broader narrative analyzed in “The Trump Files,” highlighting how Donald Trump’s presidency increasingly personalizes public institutions. Observers question whether these institutions can maintain independence amidst such a shift. Events such as Trump’s military actions and the controversial UFC event on the White House lawn illustrate a dramatic fusion of politics and performance. Internationally, the Trump era raises concerns about the survival of democratic frameworks as loyalty shifts from institutions to personalities.

In the summer of 1963, the author attended an NSF Summer Institute that transformed their career in science education, leading to further studies and collaborations supported by NSF funding. This investment in scientific literacy was crucial for the nation’s future. However, recent drastic budget cuts and restructuring at the NSF jeopardize educational programs and research initiatives aimed at fostering innovation. The author raises concerns about the implications of these changes, emphasizing potential lost opportunities for future educators and researchers, thereby highlighting the enduring importance of supporting science and education for long-term societal progress.

In March 2026, at 85 years old, my PSA score was shockingly high at 33.5 ng/ml, compared to 1.84 ng/ml a decade prior. My new doctor included this test, which revealed prostate cancer after an MRI and biopsy. My treatment involves hormone therapy followed by radiation, showcasing advancements in cancer care. I learned that age doesn’t guarantee immunity from cancer and emphasized the importance of understanding one’s health and treatment options for a meaningful life.

The Trump administration’s decision to dismantle much of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and sharply reduce foreign health assistance has become a central issue in evaluating the current Ebola crisis in the Congo. Public health experts argue that the cuts weakened the international disease surveillance network that had been built after the catastrophic West African Ebola epidemicA of 2014–2016.

Between 2001 and 2024, USAID operated on an average budget of approximately $23 billion per year.

The Republican primary for the U.S. Senate seat in Georgia features candidates vying to challenge incumbent Democrat Jon Ossoff. Mike Collins, a Trump ally, leads with a confrontational style, but raises concerns about alienating moderates. Buddy Carter represents traditional conservatism but struggles for excitement, while Derek Dooley, backed by Governor Kemp, aims to unify factions as a pragmatic outsider. Other candidates, Jonathan McColumn and John Coyne III, add to the race’s diversity but lack significant traction. Ultimately, the contest reflects broader ideological struggles within the GOP, with Ossoff currently positioned as a formidable incumbent.

The Georgia Republican primary for governor is marked by unprecedented spending, exceeding $100 million, while candidates focus on cultural issues and tax cuts, neglecting pressing topics like education, healthcare, and environmental concerns. Candidates Chris Carr, Brad Raffensperger, Bert Jones, and Rick Jackson emphasize loyalty to Trump and conservative values, but largely avoid discussing critical issues facing the state. This trend reflects a shift in the party towards ideological conformity over practical governance. The primary highlights a concern that candidates prioritize political rhetoric over addressing the real challenges impacting everyday Georgians.

The commentary discusses the recent meeting between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping, emphasizing the stark visual contrast between the two leaders and highlighting the dominance of white males in Trump’s entourage. It critiques the U.S. media for normalizing Trump’s criminal actions and stresses the importance of personal resistance against authoritarianism. The narrative underscores how local efforts and storytelling are vital in preserving democracy. It argues that collective actions and sharing personal experiences foster solidarity and challenge oppressive narratives, thereby sustaining democratic values.

Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu acted illegally in launching a lethal and devastating attack on Iran on the morning of February 28, 2026. We were not under an eminent attack, there was no discussion with Congress or the United Nations to seek support for a war....

On September 5, 1945, a mother and child began their journey of walking to school, a routine that continued as siblings joined them. This narrative intertwines with a heart-wrenching story from March 28, 2026, where a father accompanied his two daughters to school. Despite the innocence of their morning, an unforeseen event shattered their normalcy. The father would forever remember the simple moments shared, filled with love and promise, now tainted by an unimaginable loss that changed everything.

The preservation of democracy relies on individuals who interpret its challenges and defend its principles, especially during tumultuous times like the Trump era. Historians, educators, journalists, and others provided clarity and context, reminding citizens of the importance of civic engagement. Figures like Ruth Ben-Ghiat and Heather Cox Richardson highlighted authoritarian patterns, while others like Diane Ravitch and Robert Reich emphasized the significance of education and economic equity. Together, these voices illustrate that democracy endures not just through institutions, but through active participation and discourse among the public.

In a letter reflecting on an essay from 2026 by Jack Hassard regarding the U.S. military strikes against Iran, Skyler Fusaro emphasizes the significance of legal and moral questions about the war. Originally, Hassard raised concerns about the legality of the action under international law, suggesting that justifications for the strike were unstable and politically motivated. Fusaro notes that while the initial discourse seemed uncertain, it now reveals a pivotal moment in the erosion of international order. He highlights the importance of questioning governmental actions to protect democratic values and maintain legal constraints.

In recent weeks, concerns have heightened regarding the war with Iran, particularly around its legality and underlying motivations. Questions arise about whether the U.S. actions comply with international law, as the Security Council did not authorize military force. Various justifications for the war, from preventing nuclear threats to influencing Iran’s political landscape, further cloud its purpose. Additionally, the conflict’s impact on global shipping routes threatens the world economy, especially oil prices. Ultimately, clarity and justification for the war remain elusive, raising critical issues in democratic accountability.

On the Iranian War Recovered interview transcript, Atlanta Historical Archive — Annotated in the 2060s Date of original interview: March 2066Location: Washington, D.C.Interviewer: Skyler Fusaro The content is a fictional interview between Skyler Fusaro and President...

This essay explores the implications of President Trump’s military actions against Iran, emphasizing the tension between national security and democratic principles. It critiques the broad interpretations of executive power and the erosion of constitutional accountability during crises, as analyzed by scholars like Ruth Ben-Ghiat and Joyce Vance. The author stresses the importance of congressional oversight and the risks of wartime rhetoric normalizing expanded authority. Ultimately, it argues for a necessary balance between security measures and the preservation of democracy, highlighting that informed public consent is crucial in times of conflict.

On February 28, 2026, the Middle East erupted into a new phase of conflict. It was shocking and dangerous. The United States and Israel launched a coordinated military offensive against Iran. This marked one of the most significant escalations of regional warfare in...