Is a Global Temperature Difference of 1.5ºC Really Going to Cause Harm to the White House?

Written by Jack Hassard

On October 10, 2018


I have no idea.  But the WH staff should know that they are only 54 feet above sea level.

But the evidence is clear that a 1.5º degree difference in global climate change will affect millions of Americans, and billions of people elsewhere.

On October 6, 2018, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ipcc) issued its latest report entitled “Global Warming of 1.5ºC.”  The report was put together and written (“drawn up” to help Trump) by scientists from around the world, including scientists from the United States.  One of the American scientists was Drew Shindell, Professor of Climate Sciences at the Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University.  In this YouTube link, he is interviewed about global warming and talks about climate actions that can advance sustainable development.  It is no more than 10 minutes, but will be worth your time.

The authors of the report highlighted events that we see and watch reports about on various media channels, including worsening food shortages, wildfires, and the mass die-off of coral reefs as soon as 2040.  This report was the first one issued by the IPCC after the 2015 Paris Agreement to fight global warming.  

It was written by human beings that have devoted their careers to the study of climate science and we should pay attention to it.  Unfortunately, climate science has been maligned by Republicans, and especially the present occupant of the White House.  Reports like this one are treated as unsettled science by these people, and ignore the report’s findings.  The report should take center stage on media, especially TV.  But, thinking 20 or more years into the future is not urgent enough news.

Yet, the effects of global climate change are indeed current events.  Think Hurricane Michael which is near to a Cat 5 storm, and is ravaging the Florida Panhandle and moving quickly over the Southeastern part of the US including Georgia, South and North Carolina and Virginia. Do we talk about the relationship of this superstorm and global warming?  Usually not.  The government always claims that now is not the time to talk about climate change.  When, then?

Hurricane Michael

Here is what we should be talking about.  The research reported in the IPCC document plainly says that if current greenhouse gases continue at the current rate, the Earth’s atmosphere will warm up as much as 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit or 1.5 degrees Celsius.  This will happen by 2040.

Now, these scientists suggest that a 1.5ºC temperature increase over the next 20 years will have catastrophic effects.  A 2ºC increase would naturally be more severe.

Observed Global Temperature Change and Modeled Responses 

Here is what can be learned from the report.

  • Human activities have caused 1ºC of the increase in global temperature change since pre-industrial levels. Global temperature increase will reach 1.5ºC by 2030-2052 and they report this with high confidence.
  • Scientists project robust regional climate characteristics between now and living in a 1.5ºC world.  It would include increases in: mean temperature in most land and ocean regions (high confidence), hot extremes in most inhabited areas (high confidence), heavy precipitation in several regions of the world (medium confidence) and the likelihood of drought and precipitation deficits in some regions (medium confidence).
  • Sea level will continue to rise; a slower rate will be greatly beneficial to humans and ecological systems.
  • Land impacts will effect biodiversity and ecosystems.  Species will be lost.
  • Climate-related risks to health, livelihoods, food security, water supply, human security and economic growth are predicted to increase at the 1.5ºC level, and even more at 2ºC.
  • To limit global temperature increase to 1.5ºC will require rapid transitions in energy, land, urban and infrastructure and industrial systems.
  • Large-scale deployment of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) can only happen if CO2 emissions start to decline well before 2030.
  • By limiting global warming to the 1.5ºC level, impacts could be seen on sustainable development, eradication of poverty, and reducing inequalities.

Impacts and/or risks associated with the Reasons for Concern (RFCs) and some natural, managed and human systems.

Reasons for Concern and Predicted Impacts for People, Economies, and Ecosystems

           

Impacts and Risks for Natural, Managed and Human Systems

Instead of speaking at a rally somewhere far from the hurricane, Trump should be reading the report (oh, he doesn’t read), or talking with the White House scientists (sorry, that’s an oxymoron).  We hear nothing from the EPA administrator.  Although global warming is not a campaign issue, the health of Americans, and the affect of storms on homes and communities is.  

Global warming is not a concept about the future, it is a reality.


You May Also Like…

70 years after Brown, Georgia is moving in the wrong Direction

70 years after Brown, Georgia is moving in the wrong Direction

This is an article written by a group of Georgia public schools high school students. One of the students to Marietta High, just a few miles away from my home. I know many of the other schools represented by these students. The students have created a statewide activist group whose goal is to improve public school education.

Shhh!  Don’t tell Mesha Mainor and Moms for Liberty about this, #2

Shhh!  Don’t tell Mesha Mainor and Moms for Liberty about this, #2

This guest post by Ed Johnson, Advocate for Quality in Public Education, Atlanta, GA
, edwjohnson@aol.com is the second of two posts written by Ed about the insanity of banning books from children’s eyes and minds. You can read the first of Ed’s posts here, Shhhh!  Don’t tell Mesha Mainor and Moms for Liberty about this. You can also find other posts written by Ed Johnson on this blog here.

President Biden and His Predecessor in Georgia

President Biden and His Predecessor in Georgia

On Saturday, March 9th, Joe Biden and his predecessor visited Georgia a few days before the March 12 primary. In Georgia, the media appears to treat President Biden and his predecessor as equals in the 2024 presidential race. But they are not—not by a long shot. The media is replicating how they covered the 2020 presidential race. This is a failure of the free press to discern the real difference between the Republican candidate and the Democratic candidate, who happens to be President of the United States. The Republican candidate sought to stay in office in 2020 by staging a coup on January 6th, 2021. He lost the election by 7 million votes and still to this day, claims the Big Lie that the other side stole the election from him. Millions of Americans believe this, also. This is the underlying context that the press forgets to mention. The predecessor spent for years while sitting in the White House chipping away at the guard rails of democracy. Thankfully he was an under achieving autocrat.

0 Comments

Post your comments

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Citizen Jack

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading