The Rule of Five and the Unmaking of U.S. Climate Law
The Trump administration’s plan to revoke the EPA’s 2009 endangerment finding threatens the foundation of environmental policy rooted in scientific evidence. Originally established through Massachusetts v. EPA, this finding linked greenhouse gases to public health risks. Despite overwhelming scientific consensus affirming climate disruption, the administration’s actions might sever the crucial bond between science and policy. The ongoing struggle is not merely legal; it reflects the broader commitment to evidence-based governance and the preservation of democracy against political interests undermining climate action.
Read More




