Some Things You Might Want Know About the House’s Clean Energy Bill

Written by Jack Hassard

On July 4, 2009

In the last post I listed ten reasons to support the Energy Bill passed in the U.S. House.  Here are some things you might find interesting about the bill.  I’ve tried, I really have, to keep my opinions out of this list.

  1. It’s long, really long.  When it it was first introduced into the House (H.R. 2454) it was about a document of about 600 pages.  The approved House version ended up being 1428 pages!  You can view it here.
  2. Known as the “American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009,” its purpose is to create clean energy jobs, achieve energy independence, reduce global warming pollution and transition to a clean energy economy.
  3. It’s divided into five titles: I. Clean Energy; II. Energy Efficiency; III. Reducing Global Warming Pollution; IV. Transitioning to a Clean Energy Economy; V. Agricultural and Forestry Related Offsets.
  4. It passed the House by just seven votes, 219 – 212.
    It was introduced by Congressmen Henry Waxman and Edward Markey. And the bill is known as the Waxman/Markey Bill.
  5. The bill will lead to a reduction of U.S. carbon emissions 17% below 2005 levels by 2020, and 83% below by 2050.  The bill puts a cap on most of greenhouse-gas emissions.  Companies can reduce their emissions to meet their cap, or buy allowances from other companies (cap and trade).
  6. Opponents (most Republicans, some Democrats, the oil industry & the National Association of Manufactures) claim that the cap and trade is the same as a really big tax on U.S. energy.  To some there has been an overstatement as to what it will cost.  The most reliable study by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicts an average cost of $175/year to U.S. households; partisan groups but the cost between $3,000 to $4300 per year per household.
  7. Like most bills, there were many compromises in order to obtain votes from both Republicans and Democrats.  For example to appease Democrats and Republicans in states whose power companies rely heavily on coal for fuel, the cap on carbon was increased, and the percentage of power produced using alternatives was reduced.
  8. The bill is complicated and not perfect, but it has brought to the surface the fact that human induced climate change is happening around the world—in one sense resulting in extreme weather conditions: heavy downpours, rising temperature and sea level, rapidly retreating glaciers, thawing permafrost, lengthening growing seasons, lengthening ice-free seasons in the ocean and on lakes and rivers, earlier snowmelt, and alterations in river flows.
  9. The National High School Debate Topic for 2008/2009 was “alternative energy” and the debate was couched in this language:Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase alternative energy incentives in the United States. House Bill H.R. 2454 has provisions for alternative energy, but because of late-breaking deal-making, power companies will not have to generate as much power from alternatives (solar, wind, geothermal)—at least for now.  This means that there will not be as much money going for the development of new solar and wind companies, electric car and public transit systems.  I don’t know whether House members consulted the resources that high school students used to formulate debate strategy on alternative energy, but you might find it very valuable.  This link will take you the “Debate Central” resource (National Center for Policy Analysis ) for high school students on the topic of alternative energy.  It’s a powerful site, and you might find it very valuable for the coming year as you begin to plan your courses. Here is a link to the high school national debate topic on alternative energy at the University of Michigan Documents Center.
  10. The debate in Washington now shifts to the U.S. Senate where they will take up a similar energy bill.  It going to be very difficult for the bill to pass in the Senate, even with 60 Democrats.

Resources:

You May Also Like…

President Biden and His Predecessor in Georgia

President Biden and His Predecessor in Georgia

On Saturday, March 9th, Joe Biden and his predecessor visited Georgia a few days before the March 12 primary. In Georgia, the media appears to treat President Biden and his predecessor as equals in the 2024 presidential race. But they are not—not by a long shot. The media is replicating how they covered the 2020 presidential race. This is a failure of the free press to discern the real difference between the Republican candidate and the Democratic candidate, who happens to be President of the United States. The Republican candidate sought to stay in office in 2020 by staging a coup on January 6th, 2021. He lost the election by 7 million votes and still to this day, claims the Big Lie that the other side stole the election from him. Millions of Americans believe this, also. This is the underlying context that the press forgets to mention. The predecessor spent for years while sitting in the White House chipping away at the guard rails of democracy. Thankfully he was an under achieving autocrat.

AGEISM

AGEISM

This post is about ageism and how we discriminate against people that are considered old. We need to look at the media and ask why they are making the case that Biden is not fit for office based on his age. Most of the people in the media, those that are writing the stories and reporting on various outlets, are much younger than either Trump or Biden. Could they be involved in a case of bias, discrimination, or bullying on the basis of age? This very well could be the case. Researchers call this ageism, patterned after sexism and racism.

Scoundrels, Weirdos, and Ne’er-Do-Wells on TX Ballot 2024

Scoundrels, Weirdos, and Ne’er-Do-Wells on TX Ballot 2024

I was intrigued by the subtitle of this article, and since I’ve spent a lot of time in Texas, I’m passing this article on to you. Scoundrels, Weirdos, and Ne’er-Do-Wells on TX Ballot 2024 by Forrest Wilder, an article in the Texas Monthly, February 8, 2024.

0 Comments

Post your comments

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Citizen Jack

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading