Author: Jack Hassard

Witnesses to the Strain of Democracy

The preservation of democracy relies on individuals who interpret its challenges and defend its principles, especially during tumultuous times like the Trump era. Historians, educators, journalists, and others provided clarity and context, reminding citizens of the importance of civic engagement. Figures like Ruth Ben-Ghiat and Heather Cox Richardson highlighted authoritarian patterns, while others like Diane Ravitch and Robert Reich emphasized the significance of education and economic equity. Together, these voices illustrate that democracy endures not just through institutions, but through active participation and discourse among the public.

Read More

A Letter from 2065 About the 2026 Iranian War

In a letter reflecting on an essay from 2026 by Jack Hassard regarding the U.S. military strikes against Iran, Skyler Fusaro emphasizes the significance of legal and moral questions about the war. Originally, Hassard raised concerns about the legality of the action under international law, suggesting that justifications for the strike were unstable and politically motivated. Fusaro notes that while the initial discourse seemed uncertain, it now reveals a pivotal moment in the erosion of international order. He highlights the importance of questioning governmental actions to protect democratic values and maintain legal constraints.

Read More

Questions Surrounding Iran: Legality, Purpose, and Economy

In recent weeks, concerns have heightened regarding the war with Iran, particularly around its legality and underlying motivations. Questions arise about whether the U.S. actions comply with international law, as the Security Council did not authorize military force. Various justifications for the war, from preventing nuclear threats to influencing Iran’s political landscape, further cloud its purpose. Additionally, the conflict’s impact on global shipping routes threatens the world economy, especially oil prices. Ultimately, clarity and justification for the war remain elusive, raising critical issues in democratic accountability.

Read More

War With Iran — Executive Power in a State of Emergency

This essay explores the implications of President Trump’s military actions against Iran, emphasizing the tension between national security and democratic principles. It critiques the broad interpretations of executive power and the erosion of constitutional accountability during crises, as analyzed by scholars like Ruth Ben-Ghiat and Joyce Vance. The author stresses the importance of congressional oversight and the risks of wartime rhetoric normalizing expanded authority. Ultimately, it argues for a necessary balance between security measures and the preservation of democracy, highlighting that informed public consent is crucial in times of conflict.

Read More

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Categories

Archives, Too

Science as Inquiry Website

The Center for Global Thinking Website

Free Online Tex

Site Security

SiteLock

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨