Why Some Georgia Districts Choose Not to Partner with the State’s Race to the Top Grant Proposal

Written by Jack Hassard

On August 26, 2010

Georgia was one of nine states and the District of Columbia to receive millions of dollars from the Race to the Top Fund from the U.S. Department of Education.  Georgia will receive $400 million.

Not all districts in Georgia will participate in the Race to the Top grant.  Three large districts in the Atlanta area, including Fulton and Cobb Counties decided not to participate.  One reason is that schools who do participate in the Department of Education proposal will have to evaluate teachers on a yet to be developed system that will no doubt include performance evaluations based in part on student achievement growth as measured on high stakes tests.  The districts participating also will have to embrace the Common Core Standards in mathematics and language arts.  The proposals funded by the U.S. Department of Education also include provisions for improving data collection and tracking systems, as well as increasing the number of charter schools in the state.

There is controversy over the research that supports these “reform” efforts, especially using the student achievement as a way to pay teachers, and the effectiveness of charter schools.

I’ll explore these two efforts, and identify some studies that shed light on why we should question the veracity of the Race to the Top assumptions, and whether this Federal program is the kind of reform that American education needs.

You May Also Like…

Beyond the Scientific Method by Charles R. Ault

Beyond the Scientific Method by Charles R. Ault

The guest post by Dr. Charles Ault, an Emeritus Professor of science education, challenges the current scientific educational approach. He critiques the traditional “unity” view that suggests science processes are universally applicable across all scientific disciplines. Dr. Ault advocates for recognizing the diversity and uniqueness of methods within each scientific discipline. He demonstrates this using examples of how geology and physics operate uniquely. He also introduces his concept of “scientific diversity,” which emphasizes that the interpretation and implementation of core scientific ideas should be adaptable to the specific discipline they are applied to. Furthermore, he suggests rethinking the traditional scientific method and adapting it to the disciplinary contexts.

A Letter from A Teen Living in 2051 about Education and the Climate Crisis

A Letter from A Teen Living in 2051 about Education and the Climate Crisis

This post focuses on education and climate as seen by a teen living in Atlanta in the year 2051.  I originally published it on April 21,  2012.  Although a work of fiction, it is presented here as a reminder of the consequences of making decisions based on faulty reasoning and ignorance.  I am re-publishing it today ahead of the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference being held in Glasgow, Scotland

0 Comments

We would enjoy reading your comments

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Citizen Jack

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading