Why do we teach science?: Voices from the classroom

Written by Jack Hassard

On December 14, 2010

My students are not passive learners of science, they ARE scientists. They embrace the idea that they are empowered to own their learning. In addition to creating a love of learning within my students, I am intentional about equipping students with wonder, teamwork strategies, and problem-solving skills for jobs that may not exist yet. Kareen Borders, Lakebay, WA

One of my goals is that students see physics everywhere through activities and projects. Students are surprised that they are encouraged to play with toys in a physics class. Sometimes students build things like windmills and motors; sometimes they dissect things like disposable cameras. Sandee Coats-Haan, Liberty Township, OH

Opening doors, allows any student with a desire to enroll in my classes. High standards, yes, but I try and inspire students through my willingness to spend evenings and weekends tutoring them. I strives to make science relevant. For example, environmental students participated in service learning activities such as habitat reconstruction. Marian DeWane, Boise, ID.

As a scientist and educator, this voice from the classroom continually investigates ways to refine her classroom practices in order to excite and engage students in scientific inquiry. She has become an inspiring role model for both staff and students for her persistent quest for improvement and her student-centered teaching. As a master teacher, she has facilitated support classes for more than 300 first-year teachers.  Jessica Gogerty, Des Moines, IA

Over the past week or so, I’ve explored the question “Why do we teach science, anyway?”  Using a paradigm from Canadian and U.K. educators, I explored the question from four vantage points: Economic, Democratic, Skills, and Culture.  Today, I thought I would turn my attention by listening to what science teachers have to say about why they teach science.  What do these voices tell us why they teach science.

The statements shown above are comments made by, and about four different science teachers, each of whom was selected as one of the 103 Presidential Awards for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching.  In each of the comments made above, the voice of the teacher when thinking about why they teach science has to do with inspiring and encouraging a love of learning science.  These teachers bring their passion into the classroom and work with their students to encourage inquiry, project work, and innovative thinking.  In each of these cases, teachers are very involved in projects not only with their own students but with their colleagues.  Many of of these science educators teach other science teachers to help them bring this same king of enthusiasm to teaching science.  No mention is made that they teach science to keep America competitive with other countries.  No mention is made that the nation’s economy is dependent upon science and engineering, the reason to teach science is produce more scientists and engineers.

No, these teachers see a more powerful role for science in our schools, and that is “in equipping students with wonder, teamwork strategies, and problem-solving skills for jobs that may not exist yet.”


You May Also Like…

NIH Mass Firings: A Turning Point for Science

NIH Mass Firings: A Turning Point for Science

This week, thousands of National Institutes of Health (NIH) employees were fired. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) is based in Atlanta. It is only a few miles from my home. It was also included in the layoffs. It’s one of 27 institutes and centers of the NIH.

The Journal of Nature described the NIH mass firings as one of the darkest days.” The article quoted Michael Osterholm, an infectious diseases epidemiologist at the University of Minnesota. He said, “This will go down as one of the darkest days in modern scientific history in my 50 years in the business. These are going to be huge losses to the research community.”

So far, 20,000 NIH employees have been fired. This group includes the directors of four institutes of NIH. These are NIAID (Allergy & Infectious Disease), NICHD (Child Health), NIMHD (Minority Health), and NINR (Nursing Research)..

Examining Trumpism: Ideologies and Impact

Examining Trumpism: Ideologies and Impact

My 2022 book, The Trump Files, analyzed the impact of Trump's first term in office on American democracy. It also covered human rights, science, and public health. Here I am examining Trumpism, its ideologies, and its impact. Nearly three years ago, The Trump Files...

The Critical Role of Federal Government in Education Reform

The Critical Role of Federal Government in Education Reform

Trump and McMahon do not know how federal and state governments are integral to public education. This system supports about 50 million students in K-12 and more than 13 million in public colleges.

President Jimmy Carter’s administration helped establish the Federal Department of Education. Ever since conservative politicians have gone out of their way to dismantle it. Ronald Reagan was the first to go after it. Now, we have Donald Trump and his crony Linda McMahon, former CEO of World Wrestling Entertainment. Trump signed an executive order to “begin eliminating” the Department of Education.

0 Comments

We would enjoy reading your comments

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Citizen Jack's Mud Creek Chronicles

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading