Using the Phoniness of “Intelligent Design” to Improve Science Teaching

Written by Jack Hassard

On November 19, 2005

Charles Krauthammer, in his piece in the Washington Post, Phoney Theory, False Conflict points out how intelligent design foolishly pits evolution against faith. As I have discussed here, intelligent design—by its own nature—is not science. Science involves asking questions. Science involves seeking answers to questions unknown. Science involves inquiry. Intelligent design—by its own nature—is a dead end because it claims that some things simply are too complicated to be investigated further. Some “intelligence” must have created the complicated structure. End of story—end of inquiry.

Krauthhammer, in his article, points out that “in order to justify the farce that intelligent design is science, Kansas had to corrupt the very definition of science, dropping the phrase ” natural explanations for what we observe in the world around us,” thus unmistakably implying — by fiat of definition, no less — that the supernatural is an integral part of science. This is an insult both to religion and science. The school board thinks it is indicting evolution by branding it an “unguided process” with no “discernible direction or goal.” This is as ridiculous as indicting Newtonian mechanics for positing an “unguided process” by which Earth is pulled around the sun every year without discernible purpose.”

One of the implications of these events (in Dover, PA, in Georgia, in Kansas) is for science teachers to help students understand the nature of science. What is science? How is science carried out? Who does science? Who funds science? Involving students in experiences in which students ask questions, and use inquiry to find answers to these questions is a fundamental goal of science teaching, and should be underscored and integral to science teaching. This is the intelligence that is needed in science teaching.

You May Also Like…

Ten Commitments for Classroom Learning

Ten Commitments for Classroom Learning

Rather than bringing religion into school, there are values that all students and teachers can ascribe to regardless of their own religious beliefs. We can find these in our history—all of our history. In my own case, as a teacher, professor, and author, I have underscored my work as a writer and teacher with humanistic ideals. This post introduces you to the Ten Commitments.

In Science Teaching, What Does it Mean to Teach Evolution Objectively?

In Science Teaching, What Does it Mean to Teach Evolution Objectively?

In a comment about the earlier post on this blog, Evolution Might be a Law, But Student Ideas are Important, Dr. Robert Lattimer, President of Citizens for Objective Public Education, raised an important idea about science teaching.  When evolution is taught in our...

0 Comments

We would enjoy reading your comments

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Citizen Jack

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading