Teaching Evolution in Church

Written by Jack Hassard

On September 26, 2005

Several weeks ago, I read an article in the Washington Post, entitled Darwin goes to Church, written by Henry G. Brinton, pastor of Fairfax Presbyterian Church. In the adult Sunday school classes, David Bush, a member of the church, and a retired government worker is offering a course, “Evolution for Christians.” Being a Christian myself, as well as a science educator, I was especially interested in Pastor Brinton’s article. It turns our that Bush has been interested in evolution for several decades, and teaches classes on theories and origins of life from time to time. Bush’s view is that science and religion answers two different sets of questions; science answers the how questions, religion answers the why questions. According to Bush, a little bit of wisdom and tolerance on both sides can result in complimentarity, rather than contradiction. Today, a group of parents in Dover, PA is seeking to overturn a decision by the local school board insisting that intelligent design – the claim that complex organisms have been designed rather than evolved in response to natural selection – must be included in the curriculum.

In the article by Brinton, he points out that many Christians, including Bush and himself, believe that the biblical account of creation is an ancient piece of poetry that was never meant to be literal, scientific desciption of origins. It answers the question of why, not how. Science on the otherhand, has not answered the question of why, but has provided a powerful explantation of how in the Darwin’s evolutionary ideas. Pastor Brinton worries out loud in the article about the “doors of science classrooms” being opened to intelligent design. Intelligent design is a religious belief and should not be included in the science curriculum. Brinton makes a strong point when he says his faith believes there is divine intelligence at work, and that evolution is a part of God’s creative plan. I think it is important not to impose religion on science, as Brinton points out, but to keep the two separate. I hope the court in Dover, PA sees the light on this, as well.

You May Also Like…

Ten Commitments for Classroom Learning

Ten Commitments for Classroom Learning

Rather than bringing religion into school, there are values that all students and teachers can ascribe to regardless of their own religious beliefs. We can find these in our history—all of our history. In my own case, as a teacher, professor, and author, I have underscored my work as a writer and teacher with humanistic ideals. This post introduces you to the Ten Commitments.

In Science Teaching, What Does it Mean to Teach Evolution Objectively?

In Science Teaching, What Does it Mean to Teach Evolution Objectively?

In a comment about the earlier post on this blog, Evolution Might be a Law, But Student Ideas are Important, Dr. Robert Lattimer, President of Citizens for Objective Public Education, raised an important idea about science teaching.  When evolution is taught in our...

0 Comments

We would enjoy reading your comments

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Citizen Jack

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading