Teachers of English Oppose Common Core Standards and National Tests

Written by Jack Hassard

On October 13, 2011

I read on the Schools Matter weblog site that the National Council of Teachers of English will consider a resolution to oppose the use of the Common Core State Standards, and national testing.  What about science teachers?  What about the National Science Teachers Association?

In their resolution, they directly show that the claims that the common core movement and national testing uses included:

  • The American educational system is broken.
  • Education must be improved to improve the economy.
  • The best way to improve education to have “rigorous” standards, and use national tests measure the “improvement.”

None of these claims can be supported.  Not only is there data to show that these claims are false, but the standards and testing movement ignore the real problems that our schools face today, and that is the increasing levels of poverty, and the impact that poverty has on student learning and success.  Neither of these movements deals with poverty, and in fact these movements claim that all student should be held to the same standards regardless of where they live.  The truth is, the U.S. has highest level of child poverty among industrial nations, and until we deal directly with this problem, we’ll make little progress in reforming schooling.

I have written at length about the relationship between the economy and student learning.  Amazingly, corporate leaders, and politicians view our youth as the problem with the economy in the sense that they claim that if we don’t improve student academic test scores, the economy will tank.  The Great Recession was not caused by low (or high) student test scores, it was caused by many years of spending on two wars, uncontrolled banking and lending practices, and large financial companies that helped lead the country down the path to a near Depression.

We do need to improve schooling, and learning.  We always have believed that.  But simply writing behavioral objectives (standards) that are “rigorous” and then testing the heck out of students has not been shown to improve learning.

We need to humanize education, not dehumanize it.  The standards and testing movements together are moving us into a space that is not conducive to student learning.  We need critical alternatives to reform, as described in Humanizing Education.   Paolo Freire put it this way in his book Pedagogy of the Oppressed:

Within history, in concrete, objective contexts, both humanization and dehumanization are possibilities for a person as an uncompleted being conscious of their incompletion.  But while both humanization and dehumanization are real alternatives, only the first is the people’s vocation.  This vocation is constantly negated, yet it is affirmed by that very negation.  It is thwarted by injustice, exploitation, oppression, and the violence of the oppressors; it is affirmed by the yearning of the oppressed for freedom and justice, and by their struggle to recover their lost humanity.

You May Also Like…

Senator Rubio’s Ideas on Science: Should we be concerned?

Senator Rubio’s Ideas on Science: Should we be concerned?

I wrote this post in 2012, about Senator Rubio’s answer to question that’s interesting to consider 22 years later. Trump picked Senator Rubio as the Secretary of State. He might become a very good Secretary of State. I hope he is in terms of working with other nations to solve problems. Nonetheless, the post that follows explores the implications of the senator’s reply when asked about the age of the earth.

Stephen Miller: A Trump Pick You May Not Know About

Stephen Miller: A Trump Pick You May Not Know About

Donald Trump has started selecting people to be part of his administration. The first batch included Tulsi Gabbard, Pete Hegseth, Matt Gaetz, and Robert Kennedy. Some folks consider them deplorable.

Yet, one of the first picks was Stephen Miller. Do you know who he is?  Or what position he’ll have in the Trump administration?  He won’t hold a cabinet spot. But he will have an office in the White House. He’ll keep his position from 2017 to 2021 as deputy chief of staff for policy.

Miller has been and will continue as one of Trump’s most influential advisors. He’s been in Trump’s orbit for nearly a decade. Miller crafted Trump’s rally speeches and designed immigration policies that banned Muslims and separated families. He will be at the center of the threat to deport millions of undocumented immigrants. The danger to American immigrant families is real. Trump is determined to carry out his threat. Stephen Miller will lead this dehumanizing and cruel assault on people.  Indeed, people like most of us. We are all descendants of immigrants who came to America for a better life. Miller is a descendant of a Jewish family that escaped from Russia in 1903.

Letter from a Dark Future

Letter from a Dark Future

Note: I received this letter on the day of the election. The letter is from Skyler Fussro, a young woman living in the 2055. I have received letters from Skyler for several decades. You can read some of them here. Usually, she is calling me out for our dismal approach to education and climate change. She is also in touch with Greta Thunberg, the young Swedish climate change and humanitarian activist.

But this letter reflects a deep concern she has with Donald Trump’s election by primarily white men and women. She says that the America she is living in is more diverse than it was in 2024. By the way, she lives with her family in a high-rise apartment in central Atlanta. It is a few blocks from Five Points and the campus of Georgia State University. I was a professor there from 1969 to 2003.

0 Comments

We would enjoy reading your comments

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Citizen Jack

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading