Should science teaching be political? A Humanistic Question

Written by Jack Hassard

On May 13, 2010

Yesterday, I wrote about how science teacher education needs to embrace a humanistic perspective, and work with teachers at their highest level.  Today there is a dismissive language that runs across the political spectrum condemning public schools, and teachers.  This is fairly well documented in Diane Ravitch’s recent book, The Death and Life or the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education.  Throughout my writing on this blog I have advocated a humanistic perspective, and the need to embrace  a humanistic view in teaching and learning.  About a year ago I wrote a post that seems apropos today.  Here it is as published last year:

I could have titled this “Is science teaching political?: A Humanistic Question.” In an article (Scientific literacy: A Freirean perspective as a radical view of humanistic science education) recently published in Science Education, Wildson L.P. dos Santos, of the Instituto de Quimica, Universidade de Brasilia, describes a rationale for advancing a new idea in humanistic science education developed from a Paulo Freire perspective. It relates to many discussions about humanistic science education that have been posted on this weblog, and I want to talk about the implications of dos Santos’ research.

Firstly, this is an important contribution to the field of science teaching, and to those science teachers who advocate a humanistic science education paradigm. Dos Santos bases his research on the perspective of teaching advanced by Paulo Freire, an early advocate of humanistic ideas in education. Freire’s, The Pedagogy of the Oppressed, describes the pedagogy that forms the foundation of dos Santos’ analyses of humanistic science education. The core of Dos Santos’ ideas are reflected in this passage from the abstract of his paper:

From Freirean educational principles, the idea unfolds that a Freirean humanistic science education perspective is a political commitment to sociopolitical action, considering conditions of oppression in society. Although some humanistic science education approaches to school science have incorporated a sociopolitical perspective, it is showed that not all of them necessarily focus on the political purpose of transforming oppressive conditions in society as stressed by Paulo Freire. From this Freirean humanistic perspective, an approach to science education is then highlighted, which implies the introduction of socially relevant themes and socioscienti?c issues, the establishment of a dialogical process inclassroom, and the development of sociopolitical action (Italics mine).

This paper is a call to action for science educators—teachers, professors of science education, and developers of science curriculum—to rethink how STS (science, technology & society) and STL (scientific and technological literacy) might be used to advance Dos Santos’ ideas.

In the view developed by Dos Santos, we are challenged not to be neutral politically, and at the same time not to impose our own values. This has always been a serious issue for science teachers who supported an STS approach to teaching. The very fact of involving students in science-related issues begs the question, why this issue? Is it important to the teacher? Or is it an issue that students should deal with? What will it teach the students?  In whose interest is studying this issue?  According to dos Santos, teaching is directive and political in itself, and teachers who choose to bring STS in the classroom will have to reveal their own views, but at the same time must enable every student to express his or her ideas, and indeed to develop and take action on their own choices. dos Santos puts it this way:

The challenge of humanistic education is therefore not to give the answer but to prepare students to refect on, and select their own destiny. The role of the teacher is not to reveal the reality to their students but to help them discover the reality for themselves; not to impose their values or to give their solutions to SSI, but to help students understand the different values and alternatives available so they can select their own.

A humanistic science education approach to teaching would involve students in debates about the issues they are exploring, and to go deeper into the implications of the issues they are studying to incorporate the contradictions related to the issues around the world. As stated by Dos Santos:

If the course is for students who have a good social condition, the prompt could lead to a comparison of their situation to that of students incontrasting contexts in their country or in another country they relate to—for instance, a country that was colonized in the past by their own country; or a country from which their own country imports food. The role of the teacher is to facilitate this debate, to ponder students’ opinions as well as his own, but never to impose it.

Wildson dos Santos presents intriguing ideas for us as science teachers not only to ponder, but to consider how we might incorporate his ideas into our own practice.  These pedigogical ideas bring us into unsafe territory, but in fact it might be the territory that would attract many of our students. What do you think? Would enjoy hearing your ideas.

You May Also Like…

Senator Rubio’s Ideas on Science: Should we be concerned?

Senator Rubio’s Ideas on Science: Should we be concerned?

I wrote this post in 2012, about Senator Rubio’s answer to question that’s interesting to consider 22 years later. Trump picked Senator Rubio as the Secretary of State. He might become a very good Secretary of State. I hope he is in terms of working with other nations to solve problems. Nonetheless, the post that follows explores the implications of the senator’s reply when asked about the age of the earth.

Stephen Miller: A Trump Pick You May Not Know About

Stephen Miller: A Trump Pick You May Not Know About

Donald Trump has started selecting people to be part of his administration. The first batch included Tulsi Gabbard, Pete Hegseth, Matt Gaetz, and Robert Kennedy. Some folks consider them deplorable.

Yet, one of the first picks was Stephen Miller. Do you know who he is?  Or what position he’ll have in the Trump administration?  He won’t hold a cabinet spot. But he will have an office in the White House. He’ll keep his position from 2017 to 2021 as deputy chief of staff for policy.

Miller has been and will continue as one of Trump’s most influential advisors. He’s been in Trump’s orbit for nearly a decade. Miller crafted Trump’s rally speeches and designed immigration policies that banned Muslims and separated families. He will be at the center of the threat to deport millions of undocumented immigrants. The danger to American immigrant families is real. Trump is determined to carry out his threat. Stephen Miller will lead this dehumanizing and cruel assault on people.  Indeed, people like most of us. We are all descendants of immigrants who came to America for a better life. Miller is a descendant of a Jewish family that escaped from Russia in 1903.

Letter from a Dark Future

Letter from a Dark Future

Note: I received this letter on the day of the election. The letter is from Skyler Fussro, a young woman living in the 2055. I have received letters from Skyler for several decades. You can read some of them here. Usually, she is calling me out for our dismal approach to education and climate change. She is also in touch with Greta Thunberg, the young Swedish climate change and humanitarian activist.

But this letter reflects a deep concern she has with Donald Trump’s election by primarily white men and women. She says that the America she is living in is more diverse than it was in 2024. By the way, she lives with her family in a high-rise apartment in central Atlanta. It is a few blocks from Five Points and the campus of Georgia State University. I was a professor there from 1969 to 2003.

0 Comments

We would enjoy reading your comments

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Citizen Jack

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading