Shock and Awe: The Anthropocene in the Age of Trump

Written by Jack Hassard

On July 14, 2017
Shock and Awe: The Anthropocene in the Age of Trump

The Anthropocene is a proposed geological time period that marks the effects of human activity on the planet Earth.  According to one concept, the Anthropocene means relating to or denoting the current geological age, viewed as the period during which human activity has been the dominant influence on climate and the environment.

A recent book, The Shock of the Anthropocene: The Earth, History and Us by Christophe Boneuil & Jean-Baptiste Fressoz, the authors explore the environmental crises, but also a new geological period caused by human activity over the past two centuries.

The Trump administrated should be feared in the context of the environmental crisis, global warming, and climate change.  Although the current crisis pre-dates the Trump era, their policies, and plans for the environment, energy, transportation will re-create the shock and awe military doctrine that has destroyed many places on the earth.  Unfortunately, Trump and his associates are the Great Denialists, and have promised to cut back on much of the progress that has been made in the last decade.

Yet, we must admit that the “progress” cited above is meager given the disregard to scientific evidence that the planet is changing in accelerating ways including temperature change, increased air pollution, polar ice melting, glacial retreat, sea level rise, species extinction, changes in the migration patterns of animals, effects of water changes and extreme temperatures on plants.

Planetary conditions have not improved substantially, even with the emphasis by the Obama administration on energy alternatives and environmental protection.

There are many actors that the finger should be pointed at that underly the utter damage that has been done to the Earth.  Energy consumption, especially in advanced capitalist societies (such as the US and Britain) has increased at exponential rates since the 1800s (which was the time that atmospheric chemist Paul Crutzen identifies as the beginning of the Anthropocene).

Boneuil & Fressoz name 90 companies that have been responsible for 63% of global CO2 and methane emissions.  Yet, as they point out, books are written about the “ecological crisis” but do not mention one of these companies.  Chevron, Exxon and BP are among biggest contributors to this mess. Little mention is made of capitalization, war or even the United States.

Trump has said he’s going to bring back coal.  Actually, coal has never left our energy shopping list.  Coal, which is less efficient than oil or gas, is still what we consume at great rates, and in fact, it was at a peak in 2014.  Imagine.  There is not much Trump can do on this front, so don’t make it an issue.

What should be made an issue of is the shock and awe that is created by these 90 companies, and the military-industrial-complex led by the United States, which spends about 611 billion dollars (2016) on its military machine, and continues to wage war, especially in the middle east.  It takes the following 9 countries in order of spending to equal the amount spent by the United States:

  1. China (215)
  2. Russia (69)
  3. Saudi Arabia (63)
  4. India (55)
  5. France (55
  6. United Kingdom (48)
  7. Japan (46)
  8. Germany (41)
  9. South Korea (36)

If you want to call out countries that are contributing to the environmental crisis on the basis of its military, look no further than to the United States.

If you want to call out companies (in the United States), here is a list to get you started.  Here are the top 10.

  1. American Electric Power
  2. Duke Energy
  3. Southern Company
  4. United States Government (own the Tennessee Valley Authority)
  5. Berkshire Hathaway
  6. Ameren Corporation
  7. Luminant Generation Company
  8. First Energy
  9. AES Corporation
  10. Excel Energy Inc

And here are few other top polluters of the Earth.

  • ExxonMobil
  • BP
  • U.S. Steel
  • ArcelorMittal
  • Koch Industries

Why do you think we need to be active in fighting against the Trump administration?  Just look to his cabinet appointees.  Secretary of State, former head of ExxonMobil.  EPA Administrator, former attorney general of Oklahoma who sued the EPA more than 20 times.  The list goes on and on.  Many, if not all, have deep connections to the companies that have caused the most damage to the Earth’s environment, and to the rapid way in which the climate is changed.

What do you think?  Shock or Awe?  Both.

You May Also Like…

Kamala Harris for President, New York Times

Kamala Harris for President, New York Times

The New York Times editorial board on Monday endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris, calling her “the only patriotic choice for president” while painting a grim picture of a second term for former President Donald Trump.

101 Years Ago, Germany Sought A Dictator: I Hope We are Not.

101 Years Ago, Germany Sought A Dictator: I Hope We are Not.

101 Years Ago, Germany Sought A Dictator: I Hope We Are Not. Germany had suffered the trauma of defeat in World War I. Significantly, there were plots to bring down German democracy. Donald Trump thinks he’s a “strongman.” He certainly utters some of the words used by dictators and strongmen. But Trump is not A strongman. He desperately wants to be. He is weak and old. Trump may be a weak strongman, but he is a dangerous wanna-be dictator. If he were elected, he would surely undermine and attempt to dismantle democratic guard rails. He’s a convicted felon and shouldn’t be president

Science in the Age of Trump: Let’s Not Let it Happen Again!

Science in the Age of Trump: Let’s Not Let it Happen Again!

Science in the age of Trump was diminished at the peril of the health and well-being for not only people and other living things, but Earth itself, including its air, water, land, and other natural resources. Let’s not let it ever happen again. Trump must be defeated in November. Science was attacked hundreds of times during the Trump years, and the effects were detrimental not only to science, but to the very nature of democracy.

0 Comments

Discover more from Citizen Jack

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading