Paradigms Compared

Written by Jack Hassard

On December 15, 2006

Education in America has finally reached the 21st Century, chronologically at least, but not pedagogically. Education is still remarkably similar to what education was like in late 19th Century! We still put kids in classrooms of about 30, arrange then into rows and columns, and tell them to study for the test. The paradigm that is used in most schools today is the same paradigm that educators used in the 1890’s. We might call this the traditional paradigm of teaching and learning. Or perhaps, the permanent paradigm of learning.

Here are some details of this paradigm.

Traditional Paradigm

If you would go into a classroom you would find that students, in general, work individualistically—sometimes in groups, but individual learning is the goal. Most teaching is teacher-directed creating a dependent social system. Choices are made for the students. Rarely do students choose content or methodology for their investigations. The emphasis in the classroom is on literacy–that is knowing facts, skills and concepts. As far as content is concerned, it is the role of the teacher to impart the right body of knowledge, and for students to acquire it. When you spend time in these classrooms you will find that the learning methods used primarily encourage the recall of information. Some would add that learning is too analytical and linear. All of this should be very familiar to you. This is the classroom you know; it is the classroom that your students, and children know. But here is the kicker, it’s the classroom that your grandparents know.

This model is failing to meet the needs of most students, especially students in urban school districts.

As I have written in the previous two posts, education needs to focus on helping students become creative and innovative thinkers. The system of education in place today prepares learners to do routine work; in a global economy, workers need to be able to solve problems, and think-on-their-feet. Schools need to be organized using a paradigm that supports this goal. Enter the global thinking model.

This is not a new model. Teachers have been using elements of this model for more than a century. John Dewey proposed teaching along this line in the 1920’s. Educators throughout the 20th Century explored some of the elements here, but schools, as-a-whole, have not embraced it. Here is what it looks like. We’ll call it the global thinking paradigm.

Global Thinking Paradigm

If you were to visit a classroom based on this model, you would notice immediately that the teacher encourages innovative and flexible thinking. Students work collaboratively in small teams to solve problems, think together as a team, and take action together. This is a skill that nearly all work environments require today. Interdependence is the motto for learning in this classroom. You might say that a synergic system is established in groups within the classroom. You might also see evidence that the teacher of these students engages them in what we call a “global community of practice” by involving them with students from other schools in real problems solving using the Internet. Students are involved in choice-making including problem and topic selection, as well as solutions; reflects the action processes of grassroots organizations. The curriculum is driven by
a new literacy insofar as “knowledge” relates to human needs, the needs of the environment and the social needs of the earth’s population and other living species. The key for learning is on inquiry, learning how to learn, and how to ask questions. And you will conclude that classroom’s based on this paradigm encourages creative thinking, and is holistic and intuitive.

You May Also Like…

Letter from a Dark Future

Letter from a Dark Future

Note: I received this letter on the day of the election. The letter is from Skyler Fussro, a young woman living in the 2055. I have received letters from Skyler for several decades. You can read some of them here. Usually, she is calling me out for our dismal approach to education and climate change. She is also in touch with Greta Thunberg, the young Swedish climate change and humanitarian activist.

But this letter reflects a deep concern she has with Donald Trump’s election by primarily white men and women. She says that the America she is living in is more diverse than it was in 2024. By the way, she lives with her family in a high-rise apartment in central Atlanta. It is a few blocks from Five Points and the campus of Georgia State University. I was a professor there from 1969 to 2003.

Another Existential Threat: Donald J. Trump

Another Existential Threat: Donald J. Trump

Donald Trump is now the president-elect and brings upon us another existential threat. In my book, The Trump Files, I concluded that Trump poses a significant risk. This is a conclusion I made if he were ever elected again as President. His election created an existential threat.

Kamala is My Choice for President.  Who’s Yours?

Kamala is My Choice for President. Who’s Yours?

t’s Election Day in the United States. I’m writing this at 6:30 p.m. Eastern time. Millions of Americans will stand in line to vote. By 7:00 p.m., a third of the country will have voted. By 10:00, nearly all those wanting to vote will have cast their votes. Kamala was my choice. Who was yours?

0 Comments

We would enjoy reading your comments

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Citizen Jack

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading