If Science Courses Were Optional, Would Students Enroll?

Written by Jack Hassard

On September 13, 2010

Yesterday I wrote about the drive to “standardize” curriculum in the U.S. through the implementation of Common Core Standards.  Already, we have the Common Core Standards in Mathematics and Reading, and National Research Council has hired Achieve (the same organization that wrote the Math and Reading standards) to write the new generation of science standards.  This top-down effort is largely driven by private organizations and corporations, who have convinced the U.S. Department of Education to implore  all of the states to adopt these uniform standards.   The uniform standards will lead to a national battery of tests, which will be used to track student achievement, as measured on these tests.

Today, I received an email from Ingvar Stål, PhD, Senior lecturer in Physics, Chemistry and Science at Botby Högstadieskolas (Junior High School) in Helsinki, Finland.  We’ve been writing to each other over the past year or so because of our mutual interest in science teaching from a innovative point of view.  On the 16th and 17th of September, Dr. Stål will host a conference at Botby Junior High School for science teachers around Finland to learn about his and his colleagues approach to science teaching.  In 2005, Dr. Stål offered an optional “club” science course, wanting to find out if an optional science course was offered, would students enroll in the course.  Now, five years later, the optional science curriculum at Botbay enrolls 1/5 of the students in the school, and the two-day conference at the school to learn about how a club program became an optional science curriculum.  If you follow this link, you can read about their program, find out about their curriculum, and see the results of student’s science work and investigations.

The program at Botbay Junior high is not only optional, but is designed to offer students opportunities to explore science, using their inquisitiveness and curiosity, and professional expertise of their teachers to facilitate this process.  Here is what Dr. Stål says on his school’s website about the Botby Science Program.

Why does the wind blow? Where does the rivers water flow? Why is a lemon sour? What is thunder and lightning? What’s needed to shoot a rocket? How can we catch a criminal? Why are you sick and why do you get a fever? How old is Earth? The list of your and your friends’ questions about reality can continue. But where do you get your answers to your questions? There is actually a source for it. The source is called science. Natural science is a fascinating world – interesting and fun. Science in general consists of astronomy, geography, physics ,chemistry and biology. Many physical, biological, chemical, astronomical and geographical phenomena are linked together. SCIENCE helps you to examine how, why and for what can we use knowledge about nature to our benefit without destroying nature itself.

With this website we want to tell the inquisitive students and teachers about science teaching in our school.

The model of teaching that Dr. Stål has created at his school, and is sharing through science education research, and teacher training is the kind of approach to teaching and learning that ought to be reflected in our schools.

You May Also Like…

Beyond the Scientific Method by Charles R. Ault

Beyond the Scientific Method by Charles R. Ault

The guest post by Dr. Charles Ault, an Emeritus Professor of science education, challenges the current scientific educational approach. He critiques the traditional “unity” view that suggests science processes are universally applicable across all scientific disciplines. Dr. Ault advocates for recognizing the diversity and uniqueness of methods within each scientific discipline. He demonstrates this using examples of how geology and physics operate uniquely. He also introduces his concept of “scientific diversity,” which emphasizes that the interpretation and implementation of core scientific ideas should be adaptable to the specific discipline they are applied to. Furthermore, he suggests rethinking the traditional scientific method and adapting it to the disciplinary contexts.

Beyond Science Standards

Beyond Science Standards

I want to tell you about a book that was just published in the field of science education. It’s a book that I was asked to write the forward. I’ve never been asked to write a forward for a book. But I was honored, and I want to encourage you to examine this book, whether you are a science educator, a scientist or a citizen interested in public education.

A Letter from A Teen Living in 2051 about Education and the Climate Crisis

A Letter from A Teen Living in 2051 about Education and the Climate Crisis

This post focuses on education and climate as seen by a teen living in Atlanta in the year 2051.  I originally published it on April 21,  2012.  Although a work of fiction, it is presented here as a reminder of the consequences of making decisions based on faulty reasoning and ignorance.  I am re-publishing it today ahead of the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference being held in Glasgow, Scotland

0 Comments

We would enjoy reading your comments

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Citizen Jack

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading